ST status for Meiteis | Tribal body not aggrieved party, has no locus  standi to appeal, says Manipur government - The Hindu

In the state of Manipur, a contentious issue has emerged regarding the inclusion of the Meitei community in the Scheduled Tribes (ST) list. The Manipur government has recently put forth its position, stating that the All Manipur Tribal Union lacks the necessary locus standi to file an appeal against the order of the Manipur High Court. This article aims to shed light on the intricacies of the situation and explore the perspectives surrounding the ST status for Meiteis.

Table of Contents

  1. Introduction: The March 27 Order
  2. The Role of the All Manipur Tribal Union
  3. The Manipur Government’s Stand
  4. Ethnic Conflict and its Triggers
  5. Exploring the Debate Surrounding ST Status
  6. Meitei Community: Historical Background
  7. The Significance of Scheduled Tribes Status
  8. Implications for the Meitei Community
  9. Ensuring Social Harmony: Finding Common Ground
  10. Conclusion
  11. FAQs

1. Introduction: The March 27 Order

On March 27, Acting Chief Justice M. V. Muralidharan issued an order directing the Manipur government to recommend the inclusion of the Meitei community in the Scheduled Tribes list. This decision sparked a series of events that led to an ongoing ethnic conflict between the dominant Meitei community and the tribal Kuki-Zomi community.

2. The Role of the All Manipur Tribal Union

The All Manipur Tribal Union, which is currently appealing against the March 27 order, claims to represent the interests of the tribal communities in Manipur. However, the Manipur government argues that the union does not possess the necessary locus standi, as it is not an aggrieved party in this matter.

3. The Manipur Government’s Stand

The Manipur government firmly believes that the All Manipur Tribal Union does not have the legal right to challenge the order for Meiteis’ inclusion in the ST list. It argues that the union lacks the locus standi required to file an appeal, as it is not directly affected by the decision.

4. Ethnic Conflict and its Triggers

The March 27 order became the immediate trigger for the ethnic conflict between the Meitei and Kuki-Zomi communities. The inclusion of the Meitei community in the ST list was perceived by some members of the Kuki-Zomi community as a threat to their own identity and rights.

5. Exploring the Debate Surrounding ST Status

The issue of granting ST status to the Meitei community has been a subject of debate for many years. Advocates argue that it would provide social and economic benefits to the Meiteis and help address historical injustices. Critics, on the other hand, express concerns over potential dilution of resources and benefits meant for existing tribal communities.

6. Meitei Community: Historical Background

The Meitei community, predominantly inhabiting the valley areas of Manipur, has a rich historical and cultural heritage. They have been classified as a general category in the state and have long demanded inclusion in the ST list to gain access to the various welfare schemes and constitutional safeguards provided to the Scheduled Tribes.

Meiteis in ST list: Manipur govt yet to take position on contentious HC  order | North East India News,The Indian Express

7. The Significance of Scheduled Tribes Status

Scheduled Tribes status grants certain privileges and affirmative actions to the communities included in the list.